All Sux dot Com » liveleak http://allsux.com Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:16:14 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Allsux Retrospective Part 2: The Worst of the Sux http://allsux.com/2007/06/17/allsux-retrospective-part-2-the-worst-of-the-sux/ http://allsux.com/2007/06/17/allsux-retrospective-part-2-the-worst-of-the-sux/#comments Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:30:58 +0000 kroq http://allsux.com/2007/06/17/allsux-retrospective-part-2-the-worst-of-the-sux/ In this latest installment of the AllSux retrospective, I’m taking a look back at the site’s most controversial and popular posts! If you’ve been reading for a while you may or may not have seen these, but they are the ones that put the site on the map and brought in the readers it has today.

(5) This post about Ask, Google and Google-Sux got some attention mostly because I bashed a site, and its administrator came back at me guns blazing. However, their counterarguments got shut down pretty fast. In reality, I think it was the comments that drew more attention than the post.

(4) This post about the huge scandal about LiveLeak not being indexed by Google drew a lot of readership, though much of it was from a Spanish site I never was able to decipher!

(3) Of course, one of the biggest AllSux targets has been Digg.com – and this story that followed the huge Digg scandal was the most popular of them all. While other blogs (and major news sites like Wired) were confused, I stayed up all night and summarized what was going on.

(2) The Technorati experiment had a huge readership. I think that a lot of people are interested in the deeper consequences of using social networks, and this post struck a cord with folks.

(1) Of course the most visited page on AllSux is Allsux! That bodes well for this and my other (newer) blog, because it means that there are a lot of readers who want to see the lates and greatest, and don’t just show up to read a single post and leave. Thanks to you all – keep visiting, reading, and please leave comments! Also visit this new blog I’m helping develop: WebUrbanist.com.

An honorable mention goes to all of the articles on AllSux about Helium. Though none of these pages have individually made the top five, they have cumulatively done amazingly well. Why? Because other frustrated Helium writers keep finding them and sending me words of support as well as their own stories bout Helium.

]]> http://allsux.com/2007/06/17/allsux-retrospective-part-2-the-worst-of-the-sux/feed/ 1 LiveLeak Still Showing False Google Complaint Video? http://allsux.com/2007/05/20/liveleak-still-showing-sad-video-why/ http://allsux.com/2007/05/20/liveleak-still-showing-sad-video-why/#comments Sun, 20 May 2007 21:52:34 +0000 kroq http://allsux.com/2007/05/20/liveleak-still-showing-sad-video-why/ Many weeks after the initial LiveLeak-not-indexed-by-Google scandal, the site still has a video up where an administrator complains to Google about not being indexed. As it turned out, the situation appeared to be LiveLeak’s fault. One would think they’d stop showing the video, unless it was a ploy all along to bring in more viewers, right? If they insist on showing an out-of-date video that makes them look like martyrs, LiveLeak should at least post a prominent link to an updated video that explains what really happened, right?

Meanwhile, the site (according to a semi-anonymous commenter) apparently contends this was never LiveLeak’s fault in the first place. So why can’t I find a follow-up video on LiveLeak showing how the situation was resolved? If they were really ‘censored’ by Google, wouldn’t they have that up by now? Heck, even if they were right and it was Google’s fault, having a video that suggests LiveLeak isn’t indexed by Google currently (you have to scroll to the comments to figure out this isn’t true anymore) is still misleading!

The top search result for Google Censors Liveleak is still this misleading out-of-date video. Why don’t they remove it? Update it? Write a follow-up and link to it prominently near that video? LiveLeak is, in my opinion, still cashing in on the residual PR value of being unlisted by Google, to the point of misleading people who seek the full story.

]]> http://allsux.com/2007/05/20/liveleak-still-showing-sad-video-why/feed/ 14 LiveLeak = 500,000+ Visitors/Day -> Not Indexed by Google? http://allsux.com/2007/04/11/site-with-500000-visitorsday-not-indexed-by-google/ http://allsux.com/2007/04/11/site-with-500000-visitorsday-not-indexed-by-google/#comments Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:29:52 +0000 kroq http://allsux.com/2007/04/11/site-with-500000-visitorsday-not-indexed-by-google/ LiveLeak.com is a sometimes-controversial video-based site which receives over a half-million visitors a day and was, until just now, completely unindexed in Google – because they accidentally told Google not to index their site! The funniest part is that, as of 4 AM PST, their own front page still has a ‘try it for yourself’ link that encourages users to see that they aren’t indexed by Google.

In a rather tragic personal video a depressed-sounding LiveLeak administrator describes how he has been trying to contact Google about this potential act of censorship. Meanwhile, this video has received comments ranging from ranging from “google has stepped out of bounds” to “google is with the government in censoring the internet and they must be stopped!!!” Meanwhile, of course, they were informed (by a friend of mine) of the problem and, as you can see below, have fixed it:

Live Leak Appears to be Leaking Own Brain out of Own Web Page

Even the Wikipedia article on Google censorship contains an (albeit now contested) sub-section pointing out this issue.  How can a site with a half a million visitors a day and numerous web professionals looking into the problem NOT figure this out sooner? Go(d)ogle only knows, but now that they have removed the bot they are sure to get a flood of links from Google. Maybe it was just reverse psychology to begin with :P


]]> http://allsux.com/2007/04/11/site-with-500000-visitorsday-not-indexed-by-google/feed/ 23